Home || News || Reviews || Articles || Contact || Store || Forums || Dumbass Database
Home
News
News Archive
Reviews
Articles
Contact
Store
Forums
Dumbass DB

» I need good web hosting
» Tired of spam
» Scholarships
» Hi! signature question...
» i forgot windows xp password.....

TwistedMods.com
Canada Forums
Explosive Labs
FindProductReview
HardAvenue.com
IceTeks
Kirba
Legion Hardware
MaXit Mag
OCIA
Overclockers Club
RipNet-UK
Rizenet
ThinkComputers
Ultra X
ViperLair
Virtual Hideout
VoidedWarranty
Syndicate:
XML
Asus 50x Max Vs Acer 50x Max Shootout
Page 2 - The Tests
Author: Dan Podhola (WebMasterP)
Date: October 21, 1999
Category: Hardware
Options: Printable Version 12 pt Times New Roman 10 pt Times New Roman 12 pt Tahoma 10 pt Tahoma


SiSoft Sandra 99 Professional w/ 'The Matrix' DivX
Asus 50x on Beast
Asus 50x on Frag-Machine
Acer 50x on Beast
Acer 50x on Frag-Machine
2316
1504
828
828
 |
0
 |
397
 |
794
 |
1191
 |
1588
 |
1985
 |
2382


As you can see Slugo's slow hard drive had a lot to do with the score of the Asus on The Frag-Machine. If you have an ATA33 hard drive I don't think this should be a problem, being that Slugo's hard drive is slower than that. The Acer scored really low, I don't think that hard drive speed mattered, being that it scored exactly the same on both machines. As a side-note, Slugo didn't install the DOS/Win3.x Drivers for the Asus; which, I found to actually increase the drive's speed. When I first installed the Asus in my computer it scored low, I then installed the drivers, rebooted and then I got a 800+ point performance gain on the benchmark.

Ok, now that we have SiSoft's opinion, lets put them to some "real world" tests. We'll do some autoread and install speed timing.

Page 1
More Benchmarks!



Join Xtreme Tek's Mailing List


Copyright © 1999 - 2018 Xtreme Tek. All rights reserved.